[Editor's Note: This article was written in 2010 by Chad Quella, who retains all rights to it.]
With a cartful of our staple groceries at the usual family trip to the Mechanicsville Kroger, we got into the shortest checkout line and waited. But after a while of staying in one spot and not advancing in line, I began to pay attention to what was going on ahead of me.
With a cartful of our staple groceries at the usual family trip to the Mechanicsville Kroger, we got into the shortest checkout line and waited. But after a while of staying in one spot and not advancing in line, I began to pay attention to what was going on ahead of me.
It appeared that there was a new trainee on the register
with a more seasoned employee beside her, but what had caused the delay was a
non-standard transaction that required some hands-on training. She would get plenty of experience with that
type of transaction by the time her customer finished checking out.
Lined-up on the conveyor belt were five separate clusters of
items, each topped with a receipt-like strip of paper. It immediately struck me as poor
decision-making that this customer in front of me had selected several gallons
of milk, but also several pints of milk.
The milk in a pint bottle of course is more expensive than the milk in a
gallon bottle, and anyway I couldn’t imagine what might be going on in this
woman’s home that would require that much milk, or even allow it to all get
drank before it spoils. But hey, it
isn’t my milk.
There were a few other things too, I recall a package of
individually-wrapped cheese food slices, and a tub of cottage cheese. Big dairy fan, I chuckled to myself. But there was one last cluster of items,
different from the rest in that it didn’t have a slip of paper on top, and
rather than dairy, it was a package of seafood salad, a styrofoam tray
containing a pair of deviled crabs, and a bag of fresh lobster from the seafood
counter.
As I stood and waited and watched, these clusters of food
slowly made their way down the conveyor belt being rung up in separate
transactions, I realized that the little slips of paper were not coupons or
shopping lists, they were being used as payment!
For the first time, I took a look at who was making these
purchases. A couple, probably in their
mid-30’s, both quite overweight, sporting sweat pants and t-shirts. No kids were to be seen. I began to put together that the paper slips
must be some kind of government-issued vouchers, and the pints of milk and
other small items were probably rounding out the value of each voucher. I was informed later that this is the form
that WIC benefits are paid in, and the fact that it was the first of the month
made this the likely case.
I watched, incredulous, as the gallons upon gallons of milk
went back into the cart, and the lobster, crabs and seafood salad were rung
up. The lady produced a card for
payment of these items. I couldn’t see
what kind of card it was, but the standard “debit or
credit” question went unasked. The dairy-laden couple went on their way, allowing the Kroger
bagger to take their load out for them, and leaving us to bag our own items.
Now maybe I’ve led a sheltered life, but I don’t recall ever
having seen such a thing before. I went
home and googled “WIC lobster” on a whim.
Turns out I’m not alone! A quick search turned up these results:
Almost
right on cue, local media added a little more insight – just not in the way
they intended. First, a story in the
8/10/10 issue of Style Weekly
highlighted a Whitcomb Court mother of six, and her monthly early-morning dash
to the nearest supermarket to exchange her government-provided purchasing power
for food. The story was meant to call
attention to the “food deserts” that exist where, coincidentally, the few food
stores that remain do almost all of their business at the
beginning of the month, and almost exclusively in government benefits.
Then, our local TV news monster ran a similar story into the
ground on their channels 12, 35, and 65 afternoon, evening, and night
broadcasts on 9/1/10. It was meant to
highlight another Whitcomb Court resident who was fit to be tied because a
government computer system snafu had delayed the automatic deposit of
money-for-nothing into her account.
The TV story even went so far as to bemoan the plight of a
sink full of dirty dishes – dirty because the woman couldn’t afford to buy
soap. But after she called an automated
service for the umpteenth time that day and discovered that she had received
her handout, the last shot in the story showed her at last standing over the
sink scrubbing a frying pan.
What the article and TV news report really did for me was
provide some perspective on the welfare state and the establishment and
political attitudes that produce it. In
neither case did the journalist inquire about how these poor, downtrodden
mothers ended up single, living their pathetic existences in government-funded
housing, clinging to government-provided money to go to some horrible store and
use it to buy bottom-shelf sustenance for themselves and their children.
All they focused on was the fact that they were waiting for that check, and couldn’t wait to spend it when it came.
All they focused on was the fact that they were waiting for that check, and couldn’t wait to spend it when it came.
-----------
Chad Quella lives with his family near Richmond, Virginia.
No comments:
Post a Comment